Please enter the following info in the fields above:
- Link to Student (type the first few letter of your name, then select yourself in the list of linked records)
- Paste a link to the model that you uploaded to your ACC folder in the ACC Link field.
Image of Your Proposed Design Model
Paste a screenshot of your proposed design model here... the end product of your considering and analyzing three design options.
Side-By-Side Comparisons of Your Analysis Results
Paste at least 2 screenshots showing the side-by-side comparisons of the analysis results for your 3 design options here…
Your Recommendation for the “Best” Design Option
Enter a brief paragraph (5 to 7 sentences) outlining a brief explanation of why you chose this design option as the “best” after comparing your analyses of the proposals…
In my project, I developed three distinct design proposals using Autodesk FormIt. These designs are based on simple rectangular shapes, allowing for a streamlined exploration of building performance in terms of solar exposure, daylight penetration, and overall architectural form. Each proposal is analyzed to demonstrate its strengths and suitability in balancing environmental and functional objectives.
Proposal 1: Maximizing Solar Exposure Design Concept: This design prioritizes maximizing solar exposure, particularly for areas intended for renewable energy solutions, such as rooftop solar panels. Key Features: South-facing orientation with minimal obstructions. Flat roof to optimize solar panel placement. Simplified rectangular volumes with uniform height for even solar access. Solar Comparison Results: High solar gain throughout the day, making it ideal for energy efficiency. Minimal shading on critical surfaces, ensuring consistent sunlight. Daylight Analysis: Enhanced daylighting in south-facing rooms but may require shading devices to reduce glare.
Proposal 2: Balancing Daylight and Energy Efficiency Design Concept: This proposal aims to balance natural daylight penetration with controlled solar exposure for energy efficiency. Key Features: Vertical rectangular volumes with staggered layouts to create shading. Integration of light wells and clerestory windows to allow diffused light. Overhangs on facades to control heat gain. Solar Comparison Results: Moderate solar exposure, with strategic shading to reduce overheating. Optimized for passive cooling techniques. Daylight Analysis: Uniform daylight distribution, reducing the need for artificial lighting during the day.
Proposal 3: Sculptural Form for Aesthetic and Performance Design Concept: This design explores the integration of aesthetics with functional environmental performance. Key Features: Dynamic arrangement of rectangular blocks, creating a sculptural appearance. Varied roof slopes to maximize solar panel efficiency on specific areas. Incorporation of green terraces for insulation and rainwater harvesting. Solar Comparison Results: Strategic exposure to sunlight based on roof orientation. Slightly reduced overall solar gain due to shaded sections. Daylight Analysis: Strong focus on daylighting in common spaces, with intentional shading in private areas. Through these three proposals, I demonstrated the versatility of simple rectangular forms in achieving diverse design objectives. The analyses highlight how form manipulation impacts solar performance and daylighting, showcasing the potential for sustainable, energy-efficient architecture. For me, my “best” design option here is Proposal 2. I chose Proposal 2 as the “best” option because it effectively balances energy efficiency with occupant comfort. Its staggered vertical volumes and strategic use of overhangs minimize overheating while maintaining moderate solar exposure, optimizing passive cooling and reducing energy demand. The incorporation of light wells and clerestory windows ensures uniform daylight distribution, decreasing the reliance on artificial lighting. This proposal achieves a harmonious blend of environmental performance and functional design, making it the most well-rounded solution.