Link to Student
Journal Entry For
Project 1 - Prototype WIP
Share your work-in-progress using any media that works well for you:
From the last prototyping session, I got the following insights/feedback:
- Priority rankings:
- 2 users ranked them as money, sustainability, location, time
- 1 ranked as sustainability, money, location, time
- 1 ranked as money, time, sustainability, location
- 1 ranked as money, sustainability, time, location
- the spread of priorities affirms that we cannot assume what matters most to people; it is a valuable input to measure
- some expressed that aesthetics should also be a measure (maybe on-trend?)
- some also expressed that the location metric was not clear — do we mean where it was made? where it is being sold from?
- also life cycle. . . how long is the product going to last?
- Solutions chosen:
- 2 chose medium
- 3 chose low impact
- multiple users expressed that the green lables of “low impact” solutions made them more likely to choose it
- other users expressed that the language of “high, medium, and low impact” solutions was confusing. . . would be beneficial to rephrase
- Would you follow the directions provided?
- some said yes, even if they were offline
- most said they were really only likely to act on it if there was a link provided
Plan for Tuesday
- Make new metrics
- Location
- Supports local economy
- Where product was made
- Sustainability
- sustainable materials
- low carbon footprint
- life cycle
- Ethics of business practices
- Aesthetics/whats on trend
- Make metrics shown on product options clearer (i.e., specific dollars, tons of carbon, years it will last)
- Keep color coding!! green = good
- Shifting language of the solutions
- Positive impact - sources locally, promotes sustainability, goes above carbon nuetral
- Nuetral impact - net neutral, status-quo, conflicting factors balance out
- Negative impact - large carbon footprint, poor business factors, multiple negative factors