Huilan Huang

Journal Entry For
Module 7 - Study Your Options
ACC Folder Link
https://acc.autodesk.com/docs/files/projects/6db2c3ca-7a2c-4f34-96a1-8a8189c7754d?folderUrn=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Afs.folder%3Aco.tCLmSvNjR3eL_eM1udtBKw&viewModel=detail&moduleId=folders
Link to Student
Huilan Huang

Module 7 Design Journal Entry

Step 1 - Generative Design Framework

Step 2 - Generative Design Study

Step 3 - Generative Design Study Results

Figure 2 below shows the results of my generative design study in Dynamo/Revit, including the 22 generated building forms and the “parallel coordinates graph”. I believe there is no “optimal” building form from these results, as there are tradeoffs between the different evaluators. However, I did like the design shown below, with a slenderness ratio of 0.012, a gross floor area of 2,526,393 sf (bonus points because it has a high mid rotation, making the form more visually interesting), and a facade cost of about $48,320,990. The parallel coordinates graph is helpful for summarizing and comparing the metrics of each design. For example, one interesting trend I see is that towers with a higher mid rotation and a smaller circle radius tend to have lower concrete floor slab costs. With the information from the parallel coordinates graph, I would probably suggest to the owner to build a tower that has a higher top height (perhaps in the range of 650-700 ft), but lower concrete floor and curtain wall facade costs. The options in this range have a smaller circle radius, which helps maintain the higher slenderness ratio (more “aesthetic”).

Figure 2:
Figure 2: My Generative Design Study Results and Parallel Coordinates Graph
Figure 3:
Figure 3: My Dynamo Study Graph