Can you guarantee that the completed building will match the performance predicted by the analysis in its day-to-day operations?
No, it is impossible to guarantee that the building will perfectly match the predicted performance. Variations in real-world factors, such as occupant behavior, maintenance practices, unforeseen environmental conditions, or discrepancies in construction, can lead to differences between predicted and actual performance. However, careful adherence to design specifications and operational strategies can help minimize these gaps.
When choosing settings for each of the building performance factors, should you always choose the setting that gives the absolute lowest predicted energy use?
Not always. While choosing settings that minimize energy use is important, other considerations, such as cost, occupant comfort, feasibility, and long-term maintainability, must also be factored in. Striking a balance between energy efficiency and practical constraints ensures the design remains sustainable, cost-effective, and functional.
How can you use Insight feedback to make design choices regarding materials, lighting, PV, etc.?
Insight feedback provides data-driven analysis to guide decision-making by highlighting the energy and cost impacts of different design choices. For example, it can recommend materials with higher thermal performance, optimal lighting settings to minimize energy consumption, or PV configurations to maximize energy generation. Designers can use this feedback to prioritize strategies that align with energy performance goals while staying within budget and feasibility constraints.