Module 6 Template

Student Name
Hellen, Anthony Victor
Submitted For
Module 6 - Workspace of the Future
Panorama View Link
ACC Link
https://acc.autodesk.com/build/files/projects/1ef58c9b-27f0-4159-9a20-a270098e38a7?folderUrn=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Afs.folder%3Aco.Oyrdvj1oRMm3RTswYI8iNA&entityId=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Adm.lineage%3Ac1u1CO78Qiq37tzNTHoucg&viewModel=detail&moduleId=folders

Please enter the following info in the fields above:

  • Link to Student (type the first few letter of your name, then select yourself in the list of linked records)
  • Paste a link to the model that you uploaded to your ACC folder in the ACC Link field.

Image of Your Proposed Design Model

Paste a screenshot of your proposed design model here... the end product of your considering and analyzing three design options.

image

Side-By-Side Comparisons of Your Analysis Results

image

Paste at least 2 screenshots showing the side-by-side comparisons of the analysis results for your 3 design options here…

image
image
image

Your Recommendation for the “Best” Design Option

Enter a brief paragraph (5 to 7 sentences) outlining a brief explanation of why you chose this design option as the “best” after comparing your analyses of the proposals…

We selected Proposal 3 as the optimal design after rigorous analysis of sun hours, microclimate, and daylight potential. Sun hour results show 84% ground, 56% facades, and 92% roofs receiving at least 3 hours of direct sun outperforming Proposal 1 and Proposal 2 by maximizing passive solar gain while minimizing overheating. Microclimate analysis reveals 22% of the site below 57°F during peak heat with balanced 2.2 mph wind flow, reducing urban heat island effects compared to Proposal 1’s stagnant zones and Proposal 2’s over-ventilation. Daylight potential confirms 24% of facades in 0–5 ft² and 16% in 32–37 ft², ensuring occupant comfort and energy efficiency. These metrics collectively deliver superior sustainability, thermal performance, and visual quality making Proposal 2 Copy the clear winner.