Can you guarantee that the completed building will match the performance predicted by the analysis in its day-to-day operations?
No, it is not possible to guarantee that the completed building will precisely match the performance predicted by the analysis in its day-to-day operations. Predictions are based on models and assumptions, and real-world factors such as variations in construction, occupancy patterns, and maintenance can affect performance. Additionally, unforeseen changes in external conditions or technology may influence the building's operational outcomes. Regular monitoring, adjustments, and ongoing maintenance are essential to optimize the building's performance and address any discrepancies between predictions and actual operations.
When choosing settings for each of the building performance factors, should you always choose the setting that gives the absolute lowest predicted energy use?
Not necessarily. While selecting settings that result in the lowest predicted energy use is often desirable, it's important to consider the overall goals and requirements for the building. Optimal settings depend on various factors, including user comfort, operational needs, and environmental considerations. Striking a balance between energy efficiency and other performance factors is crucial to ensure a well-rounded and sustainable building design.
How can you use Insight feedback to make design choices regarding materials, lighting, PV, etc.?
Insight feedback provides valuable data on the performance of design choices such as materials, lighting, and PV. By analyzing this feedback, designers can assess the impact of specific choices on energy consumption, lighting quality, and overall sustainability. This information helps in making informed decisions to optimize building performance, enhance energy efficiency, and align with project goals. Designers can iterate and refine their choices during the design process, ensuring a more informed and sustainable outcome.