Module 6 - Points to Ponder

Submitted For
Module 6 - Points to Ponder
💡
Please share your comments on 2 of the following Points to Ponder questions. (Choose 2 of the questions below.)

Should all buildings be modeled first using conceptual masses?

When is it needed/appropriate? And when not?

For example, should you create a conceptual mass model of a small house?

Conceptual mass modeling is not a prerequisite for every type of building. It is especially beneficial when dealing with sizable and intricate structures like high-rises, commercial complexes, or institutional buildings. Additionally, it proves its worth in the context of urban planning and city design by facilitating the evaluation of how the new development affects the surrounding environment, taking into consideration factors like shadows, sightlines, and pedestrian flow. Furthermore, it offers a comprehensive visualization of the building's overall shape. In the case of small residential structures like single-family houses or small duplexes, it may be preferable to forego the use of conceptual masses.

Can you think of any examples of a real building around the world that most likely was created by exploring the form using conceptual mass models?

Both designed by Iraqi-British architect Zaha Hadid, my favorite architect.

Wangjing Soho, China

image
image

Heydar Aliyev Center, Azerbaijan

image
image