What are the principal advantages of creating a conceptual design model using masses before diving into the detailed design and building element modeling?
It could be a good starting off point. You get to try different layouts within the building zone before fully committing to one and modelling it in detail. Also, the analysis options in Forma can inform your decision by showing you how your new building will interact with its environment.
Should all buildings be modeled first using conceptual masses?
When is it needed/appropriate? And when not?
For example, should you create a conceptual mass model of a small house?
I don’t think you need a conceptual mass model of a small house. I think the main benefit of modelling structures with conceptual masses first is that you get to see how they will impact their surroundings. Furthermore, for complex architectural endeavours, such as skyscrapers, a conceptual mass model can show you if the design is viable or not.
Can you think of any examples of a real building around the world that most likely was created by exploring the form using conceptual mass models?
Please post and share images of these examples to this Notion page.
How would you abstract the essential form of these famous buildings using conceptual mass elements that you can create in Revit?
- One World Trade Center: https://www.archdaily.com/795277/one-world-trade-center-som
- CMG Headquarters: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CMG_Headquarters#/media/File:China_Central_Television_Headquarters_2.jpg
- Twisting torso: https://www.archdaily.com/771471/santiago-calatravas-turning-torso-wins-ctbuhs-10-year-award
- Apple campus: https://www.archdaily.com/804970/apple-campus-2-held-to-fantastical-standard-of-detail-new-report-reveals
- Salesforce tower: https://www.archdaily.com/889519/salesforce-tower-pelli-clarke-pelli-architects