Image of Your Proposed Design Model
Side-By-Side Comparisons of Your Analysis Results
Solar Energy Comparison:
Daylight Potential Comparison
Detailed Noise Comparison
Your Recommendation for the “Best” Design Option
After comparing the three proposals based on daylight potential, solar energy, and noise analysis, Proposal 1 stands out as the best overall option. While Proposal 2 achieved a slightly higher annual solar energy value, the difference was minimal and not significant enough to outweigh its drawbacks. Proposal 1 matches Proposal 3 in solar performance and noise level, meaning both maintain good environmental comfort and acoustic conditions. However, where Proposal 1 excels is in daylight potential, it provides the brightest and most comfortable interior lighting conditions, which is crucial for student productivity, well-being, and energy efficiency.
In contrast, Proposal 2 performed the worst in terms of daylight quality and generated more noise, which could negatively affect interior comfort and usability. Proposal 3 performed decently in both daylight and acoustic performance but didn’t surpass Proposal 1 in any major category. Considering all three analyses together, Proposal 1 offers the most balanced design, combining strong daylight performance with stable energy and acoustic results, making it the most effective and sustainable solution for the project.