Sodbilig Batjargal - Module 6

I chose 2 metrics as Construction Total Cost and Envelope to Floor Area Ratio (EFAR).

Envelope-to-Floor Area Ratio (EFAR) is a key metric used to assess the efficiency of a building's design. It compares the surface area of a building's envelope (exterior walls, roof, and floor) to its total floor area. This ratio provides insight into the energy efficiency, construction costs, and overall performance of a building. EFAR is crucial for evaluating the energy performance of a building. Lower EFAR typically correlates with reduced energy consumption for heating and cooling. EFAR is calculated using the following formula: EFAR=Envelope Surface Area/Gross Floor Area

Metric 1: Custom node for Construction cost

image

Metric 2: Custom node for Envelope to Floor Area Ratio (EFAR)

image
  • Main Custom Node
  • image
  • Dynamo main nodes
  • image
  • An Image/screenshot of your summary table (created in Word, Excel, Google Sheets, or any data table tool) showing the input values tested and the values computed for each of the reported parameters
Top Height
Top Radius
Gross Floor Area
Gross Surface Area
Cost of Construction
Envelop-to-Floor Area Ratio (EFAR)
1
300
15
389601
186774
227047703
0.479
2
300
30
397884
187799
232717758
0.472
3
300
45
406368
188857
238072861
0.465
4
300
60
414893
189978
243000953
0.458
5
300
75
422716
191089
247112906
0.452
6
300
90
428685
192038
249822277
0.448
7
350
15
454056
208369
271167203
0.459
8
350
30
464331
209808
278418262
0.452
9
350
45
474569
211226
285092102
0.445
10
350
60
484405
212624
290944677
0.439
11
350
75
493048
213909
295547012
0.434
12
350
90
499421
214918
298346639
0.430
13
400
15
518462
230162
317124485
0.444
14
400
30
530661
232000
326014340
0.437
15
400
45
542613
233765
334057348
0.431
16
400
60
553779
235432
340888553
0.425
17
400
75
563305
236891
346027256
0.421
18
400
90
570138
237968
348929700
0.417
19
450
15
582826
252093
364924165
0.433
20
450
30
596903
254320
375520891
0.426
21
450
45
610542
256421
384989934
0.420
22
450
60
623050
258352
392849779
0.415
23
450
75
633500
259984
398559797
0.410
24
450
90
640836
261136
401569373
0.407
25
500
15
647156
274126
414570900
0.424
26
500
30
663078
276732
426949081
0.417
27
500
45
678386
279161
437904744
0.412
28
500
60
692244
281350
446840727
0.406
29
500
75
703645
283157
453150279
0.402
30
500
90
711514
284387
456265659
0.400
31
550
15
711458
296235
466068553
0.416
32
550
30
729201
299211
480307036
0.410
33
550
45
746166
301961
492812209
0.405
34
550
60
761379
304407
502870271
0.400
35
550
75
773751
306389
509803309
0.396
36
550
90
782175
307701
513019282
0.393
37
600
15
775739
318402
519420157
0.410
38
600
30
795285
321742
535600673
0.405
39
600
45
813895
324809
549719755
0.399
40
600
60
830467
327508
560944841
0.394
41
600
75
843825
329665
568522511
0.391
42
600
90
852823
331062
571831141
0.388
43
650
15
840001
340615
574628055
0.405
44
650
30
861336
344313
592834347
0.400
45
650
45
881585
347693
608632775
0.394
46
650
60
899518
350643
621069177
0.390
47
650
75
913873
352976
629310712
0.386
48
650
90
923458
354460
632702111
0.384
49
700
15
904249
362865
631694053
0.401
50
700
30
927362
366916
652011315
0.396
51
700
45
949243
370605
669555262
0.390
52
700
60
968540
373805
683246825
0.386
53
700
75
983901
376314
692170120
0.382
54
700
90
994084
377888
695632970
0.380
55
750
15
968485
385145
690619554
0.398
56
750
30
993367
389546
713134043
0.392
57
750
45
1016876
393541
732490221
0.387
58
750
60
1037538
396989
747480485
0.383
59
750
75
1053911
399676
757102467
0.379
60
750
90
1064700
401339
760624385
0.377

Key Observations:

  1. Building Height and EFAR:
    • As the building height increases, the EFAR generally decreases.
    • Example:
      • A 300-meter tall building has EFAR values ranging from 0.479 to 0.448.
      • A 750-meter tall building has EFAR values ranging from 0.398 to 0.377.
    • Conclusion: Taller buildings tend to have a lower EFAR, meaning they are more energy-efficient. This is because they have more floor area relative to their external surface area.
  2. Top Radius and EFAR:
    • For a given building height, increasing the top radius generally decreases the EFAR.
    • Example:
      • At 300 meters height, EFAR decreases from 0.479 (15 meters top radius) to 0.448 (90 meters top radius).
      • At 750 meters height, EFAR decreases from 0.398 (15 meters top radius) to 0.377 (90 meters top radius).
    • Conclusion: Increasing the top radius reduces the EFAR, indicating a more efficient design. This is likely because a wider top radius reduces the relative amount of surface area compared to the floor area.
  3. Implications for Energy Efficiency:
    • Lower EFAR Values: Buildings with lower EFAR values are more energy-efficient. They have less surface area per unit of floor area, which reduces the amount of heat that can escape in winter or enter in summer.
    • Example: The most efficient building in terms of EFAR is a 750-meter tall building with a 90-meter top radius (EFAR = 0.377).

Other useful metrics for evaluating building designs may as follows:

Daylight Factor: Measures the natural light availability inside the building.

Energy Use Intensity (EUI): Quantifies energy consumption per unit area (kWh/m²/year).

Thermal Comfort Index: Assesses occupant comfort based on temperature and humidity.