Submitted For
Module 6 - Points to Ponder
Please share your comments on 2 of the following Points to Ponder questions. (Choose 2 of the questions below.)
Should all buildings be modeled first using conceptual masses?
I don’t think it’s necessary that all buildings be modeled first using conceptual masses. It might not be the most time-efficient design process and may not provide many benefits for more simple projects. Conceptual masses is appropriate when the design is configured of abstract shapes and an irregular layout. It wouldn’t make sense to create a conceptual mass model of a small house, but it would make more sense to use it on a large-scale project. It’s helpful to understand how the form of the large building will affect its performance, functionality, and environmental impact.
Can you think of any examples of a real building around the world that most likely was created by exploring the form using conceptual mass models?
Some examples are the Shanghai tower, Taipei 101, Shanghai World Financial Center.
