Scored
Your Name
Journal Entry For
Module 4 - Conceptual Design - Building Context & Passive Design
ACC Folder Link
ACC Revit File Link
Created
Jan 6, 2025 12:34 AM
Last Edited
Jan 6, 2025 12:34 AM
Created by
Glenn KatzTo keep Notion up-to-date as well, I have included in this page the minimum (but not exhaustive!) amount of information required for the Notion posts: images of my 3D proposal, side-by-side comparison of my analysis results, and my best recommendation. All my work (design process, calculations, and proposal selection) is meticulously described in the PDF below! ⚠️⚠️⚠️
Week 3 - Lavinia Pedrollo Design Journal Week 2.pdf6760.3KB
Images of Your 3 Design Proposals
Side-By-Side Comparisons of Your Analysis Results
Your Recommendation for the “Best” Design Option
Proposal 1 is the best design for the following reasons:
- Despite falling short of the target EUI range of 15 to 25 kBtu/sf/yr, Proposal 1 stands out with the lowest consumption among the proposals. To further enhance energy efficiency, I can later consider incorporating design elements that optimize insulation, lighting, and HVAC systems.
- Proposal 1 demonstrates exceptional sustainability by offsetting more than 88% of the annual energy use through onsite solar PV. This surpasses the target threshold of 75%, showcasing a commitment to renewable energy integration.
- The design achieves a commendable equilibrium between building height and energy efficiency. Its integration with surrounding skyscrapers maintains aesthetic harmony while aligning with some of the final design targets.
- The unconventional L shape breaks away from the conventional rectangular building form. This not only adds visual interest but also signals a departure from typical structures, contributing to a unique architectural identity.
Note: Proposal 1 must not be considered as my final design choice! If, for example, later I would consider Proposal 2, I would need to install a source of renewable energy, such as solar energy, off-site!