Testing Priorities - Updated
What product features will be most helpful to get feedback on?
‣
- Applications
- Magnetic attachability
- Magnetic
- Weight
- Recognizing whether or not the product should be lightweight and portable
‣
- Expectation of the consumer about how fast the chosen device should be charged
Testing Strategy - Updated
What is the best way for us to get useful feedback for each of these features? What does useful feedback look like?
‣
- Incorporate feedback from first session
- Show updated prototypes, including real sizes
- Not spending too much time explaining the product, but ask specific questions (from the consumer's perspective using the testing protocol)
‣
- Application
- Testers would mention precisely which application they would be interested in charging (i.e. iPhone, Laptop, Ipad)
- Is the magnetic feature trustworthy enough for you?
- Weight
- The numerical range of values (g, kg)
‣
- Time expected to charge a specific product and the aimed percentage for
Testing Priorities - Old
What product features will be most helpful to get feedback on?
‣
- Understanding the different designs and colors that our consumers will be most interested in for the PV film
‣
- Applications
- Designing the solar panels to work with the needed applications (i.e. whether to charge phones, laptops, …)
- Size
- Identify restrictions in solar module shapes with respect to the applications (i.e. too big for a laptop)
- Weight
- Recognizing whether or not the product should be lightweight and portable
‣
- Expectation of the consumer about how fast the chosen device should be charged
‣
- Figure out upper price threshold for customers
Testing Strategy - Old
What is the best way for us to get useful feedback for each of these features? What does a useful feedback look like?
‣
- Ideally: Consumers would tell us whether or not the aesthetics are important to them, and which colors and set design they’re interested in purchasing
- Alternatively: Knowing whether consumers would appreciate different colours or would prefer the traditional PV look
‣
- Application
- Ideally: Testers would mention precisely which application they would be interested in charging "solarly" (i.e. iPhone, and not just “electronic device”)
- Alternatively: Testers give out general answers (home applications, electronic device, ...)
- Size
- Ideally: Numerical range of values (about height, width, thickness)
- Alternatively: Comparable product sizes (“as large as my bag” or “as high as a water bottle”, or …)
- Weight
- Ideally: Numerical range of values (g, kg)
- Alternatively: Comparable product weights
‣
- Ideally: Numerical range of power needed for charging (i.e. specify number of watts)
- Alternatively: Specifying how much and how long consumers are expecting the PV to charge (i.e. charge 50% in 1 hr)
‣
- Ideally: Numerical range of values (in $)
- Alternatively: Comparable product prices (“as expensive as a power bank”, or …)