Image of Your Proposed Design Model
Side-By-Side Comparisons of Your Analysis Results
Your Recommendation for the “Best” Design Option
Proposal 2 had the best environmental results with 79% ground comfort, 92% roof comfort, and high solar exposure on most building sides but overall, its shape is too complicated to turn into a real building in Revit or a practical sense. The overlapping angles and sharp roof edges would make aligning floors, building the structure, and adding details too hard and expensive. On the other hand, Proposal 3 gives almost the same amount of sunlight, about 97% on the roof and 68% on the ground, has better soundproofing, and more consistent wind comfort across the site. The round tower shape lets air flow smoothly and spreads daylight more evenly, making comfortable areas without the wind issues from Proposal 2. It's also easier to build, with simpler alignment for the core and vertical movement. For these reasons, I chose Proposal 3 as the better option as it offers almost the same environmental benefits as Proposal 2, but is more practical, easier to build, and more efficient in the long run.