Rizka Oktaviani

Stage 1.1 (First Trial) – Twisting Simple Triangle Mass 2

image

55 Floors with changing parameters:

  • Top height, rotation, and radius
  • Mid rotation, height
  • Base Radius
  • Total (mass) floors

I had to change this option because even I change the building dimensions to the maximum options (from task prompt), it wouldn’t satisfy the requirements of 25,000,000 – 30,000,000 sf

Stage 1 Part 1

Baseline design:

image

Form Design Options:

image
image
image

Stage 1 Part 2

Baseline Design:

I am using family template: Twisting tower 3 profiles and changing the top height to 720’, mid height to 350’, mid and top rotation to 30 deg.

image
image

I could not find what was wrong with the original project file, but the mass did not show the required metrics properly, including Gross Floor Area, Gross Surface Area, and Gross Volume. Therefore, I changed the building design and used the new project file with Twisting 2 Profiles for the final evaluation.

image
image
image

For Part 1, I tested an example twisting tower mass by changing the twist angle as the main flexible parameter. The overall building size and form were kept generally consistent, while the twist angle was adjusted to create different design alternatives. I tested six twist angle values: 0°, 15°, 30°, 45°, 60°, and 90°. This allowed me to compare how changing the tower rotation affects the building metrics, especially the gross floor area, gross surface area, and gross volume.

For Part 2, I created my own conceptual mass form and tested it by changing the building height as the main flexible parameter. The tower form can be dynamically adjusted by modifying the height, while the general footprint and massing logic remain the same. I tested the height from 600 ft to 720 ft, increasing by 20 ft for each scenario. This helped me understand how increasing the tower height affects the total floor area, envelope surface area, and building volume.

Point to Ponder: What’s the advantage of exporting the values to Excel?

Exporting the values to Excel is useful because it makes the results easier to organize, compare, and present. Instead of manually copying every value from Revit or Dynamo, Excel allows me to quickly create a clean table for all design scenarios. It also reduces the chance of mistakes because the data can be updated directly when the input parameters change. For this assignment, Excel helped me compare the different twist angle and height alternatives more clearly, especially when evaluating gross floor area, surface area, and volume side by side.