BIMtopia
/CEE 120C/220C Parametric Design & Optimization | Spring 2025
CEE 120C/220C Parametric Design & Optimization | Spring 2025
/
🚫
CEE 120C/220C - For the Teaching Team Use Only
/
All Design Journal Entries | Spring 2025
/
2025 Design Journal Entries | Spring 2025
/
Kosuke Nibe

Kosuke Nibe

Journal Entry For
Module 7 - Study Your Options
ACC Folder Link
https://acc.autodesk.com/docs/files/projects/6db2c3ca-7a2c-4f34-96a1-8a8189c7754d?folderUrn=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Afs.folder%3Aco.O35oXcTTSTeW6sAhHlp0JQ&viewModel=detail&moduleId=folders
Link to Student
Kosuke Nibe

Please enter the following info in the fields above:

  • Your Name as the Card title
  • The link to your Module 7 folder in our Autodesk Construction Cloud project

Please also type the first few letters of your first name into the Link to Student field, then hover over your name from the list of matching records and click the blue plus sign to link this entry to your Design Journal.

Then, share your Design Journal entry here (replacing these instructions) ... Click the text area below the headers and just start typing your response. There's no need to add new properties.

Please include:

‣

Step 1 - Generative Design Framework

A very brief description of the design decisions from Step 1 following the Generative Design Framework.

  • Design Decision 1: Life Cycle Cost
    • Design Variables
      • building height
      • building width / radius
      • roof angle / shape
    • Evaluators
      • initial construction cost
      • operational energy savings
      • potential revenue
    • Most Important Tradeoffs to Consider
      • Life cycle cost by trading off between initial investment and long-term value (via energy savings and revenue).
  • Design Decision 2: Sustainability
    • Design Variables
      • glazing ratio
      • window orientation
      • envelope air tightness level
    • Evaluators
      • annual energy use
      • initial capital cost
      • daylighting
    • Most Important Tradeoffs to Consider
      • Energy Efficiency vs. Cost: Higher-performance envelopes reduce operational cost but increase capital cost.
  • Design Decision 3: Construction Schedule and Planning
    • Design Variables
      • complexity of building geometry and systems
      • level of prefablication or modularization
      • sequence and dependency of trades
    • Evaluators
      • total construction duration
      • number of trades requiring overlap or rework
      • schedule float or buffer time required
    • Most Important Tradeoffs to Consider
      • Unique design vs. Construction timeline: Uncommon detailing and sequencing may extend project duration and create uncertainties.
‣

Step 2 - Generative Design Study

  • Objective: The goal of this Generative Design study is to find the ideal building shape that minimizes construction cost while maximizing long-term energy savings and rentable floor area. The aim is to reduce life cycle costs by balancing initial investment with future operational value.
  • Model: The model uses a simple square base with adjustable width and height to form a box-shaped building. The geometry is generated using these parameters, and surface area, roof area, and floor area are calculated to evaluate cost, energy savings, and potential revenue.
  • Design Variables: Width and length of the square base, and floor height and No. of Floors.
  • Constrains: 1. Minimum and maximum floor height and No. of Floors. 2. Min. and Max. floor width and length. 3. Fixed price of construction cost per square foot on floors, walls and roof. 4. Fixed price of property potential revenue per square foot. 5. Fixed price of energy savings per square foot (assume that all exterior wall and roof area will be installed insulated windows).
  • Evaluators: 1. Construction cost based on surface and floor area to be minimized. 2. Energy savings based on exterior walls and roof area for solar/wind to be maximized. 3. Potential revenue based on total floor area to be maximized.
‣

Step 3 - Generative Design Study Results

  • The screenshot of the Scatterplot or Parallel Coordinates Graph illustrating the tradeoff that you chose to model and study.
image
  • Provide a brief explanation of what’s being shown in the Scatterplot or Parallel Coordinates Graph and how the tradeoff being illustrated would impact the design decision. What would you do with this info?

This Parallel Coordinates Graph shows different building design options and how they affect construction cost, yearly revenue, and energy savings. Each line represents one design, with variables like number of floors, floor height, width, and length. The graph shows that larger buildings with more floors can generate higher revenue and energy savings, but they also cost much more to build. This helps designers compare options and find a good balance between cost and benefits. Based on this, I would look for designs that stay within budget but still offer strong financial returns.

  • An image of your Dynamo Study Graph (showing all your nodes and the connecting logic) -- You can use the File > Export Workspace As Image... command in Dynamo to save a PNG image to upload with your posting.
image