Journal Entry For
Module 7 - Study Your Options
ACC Folder Link
https://acc.autodesk.com/docs/files/projects/6db2c3ca-7a2c-4f34-96a1-8a8189c7754d?folderUrn=urn%3Aadsk.wipprod%3Afs.folder%3Aco.f_Hst9MgShy6sUmpDIv6mw&viewModel=detail&moduleId=folders
Link to Student
Steven Song
‣
Step 1 - Generative Design Framework
‣
Step 3 - Generative Design Study Results
Summary: Prioritizing glazing area and height for aesthetics while minimizing cost yields the preferred design solution above.
1. Balanced Glazing Area and Cost
- In the scatter plot (Cost vs. Glazing Area), this design appears closer to the middle range in both axes. It avoids the extreme high-cost outliers while still offering a substantial amount of glazing area, which is desirable for daylighting and visual connectivity.
2. Low Embodied Carbon Relative to Floor Area
- Despite its large total floor area, the design maintains a moderate embodied carbon value of 2.46 billion units. This indicates good material efficiency for the space provided.
- The embodied carbon per floor area ratio is favorable compared to other options with similar or lower glazing areas but higher environmental costs.
3. Architectural Form
- The selected geometry, with a sculptural waisted form, likely contributes to aesthetic appeal.